Daria Saville vs Sara Sorribes Tormo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L W L W L W L L WHead To Head: Saville 2 - 0 Tormo
They have played 4 sets in total, with Saville winning 4 and Tormo winning 0. The last match between Saville and Tormo was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 09-02-2021, First, Hard with Daria Saville getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daria Saville | 2 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 |
Australian Open - Melbourne(09-02-2021)
6
1
7
5
| Saville | Stats | Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 118 | Ranking | 86 |
| 20 | Highest Rank | 32 |
| 31 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 55% (338-273) | Career Total W/L | 60% (427-290) |
| $3,524,826 | Career Prize Money | $2,437,306 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Michelsen VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Daria Saville
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
65%
(
20 of
31)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:11:30 | Average Match Time | 1:11:30 |
| 73% (69/95) | 1st Serve % | 66% (59/90) |
| 72% (50/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (26/59) |
| 46% (12/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (8/31) |
| 63% (12/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 62% (56/90) | Return Points Win % | 35% (33/95) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daria Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Daria Saville
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Olivia Gadecki
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
4
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
12
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Daria Saville
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Jil Teichmann
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Daria Saville
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
44%
(
11 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
56%
(
22 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
37
Total Points Won
49
|
1-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sara Sorribes Tormo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Laura Pigossi
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
93%
(
40 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Oksana Kalashnikova
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Lilli Tagger
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (338/273) | Win/Loss | 60% (427/290) |
| 54% (772/653) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (943/689) |
| 52% (6860/6442) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7788/6895) |
| 57% (194/144) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (135/116) |
| 54% (75/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (249/131) |
| 56% (45/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (21/22) |
| 44% (24/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 51% (22/21) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1023 | Aces Total | 239 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2443 | Total Double Faults | 2701 |
| 1:21:35 | Average Match Time | 1:22:12 |
| 413.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.09 |
| 63% (22045/34790) | 1st Serve % | 67% (24509/36658) |
| 62% (13766/22045) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (14100/24509) |
| 43% (5455/12742) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (4953/12143) |
| 46% (1962/4238) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2616/5138) |
| 45% (15434/34289) | Return Points Win % | 49% (17878/36590) |
| 43% (29/39) | Slam W/L | 43% (26/35) |
| 56% (68/53) | Masters W/L | 49% (40/42) |
| 42% (5/7) | Cups W/L | 57% (8/6) |
| 55% (127/106) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (137/114) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (98/63) | Challenger W/L | 68% (167/79) |
| 69% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 78% (49/14) |
| 56% (334/601) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (420/700) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 52% (72/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (72/131) |
| 53% (113/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/197) |
| 84% (328/276) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (404/367) |
| 16% (328/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (404/36) |
| 22% (282/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (313/60) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
